Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
example:combineplanar_pipelineorder [2017/08/17 11:21]
127.0.0.1 external edit
example:combineplanar_pipelineorder [2018/10/01 10:31]
131.174.46.108
Line 131: Line 131:
 {{:​example:​example:​tfr.png?​700|}} {{:​example:​example:​tfr.png?​700|}}
  
-We can see that the second and the third row indicates that the other of the ft_combineplanar does not influence the power output (same topo and power scale). This is because with the induced TFR each single trial is squared (power estimate) and ft_combineplanar cfg.combinemethod='​sum'​ on freq datatype [[http://​mathworld.wolfram.com/​VectorAddition.html|sums]] the vertical and the horizontal components. As the single trial estimates are positive (power estimates), the order of the operation does not influence the output. You can now guess whether the same logic is going to hold for the Event-Related Fields.+We can see that the second and the third row indicates that the order of the ft_combineplanar does not influence the power output (same topo and power scale). This is because with the induced TFR each single trial is squared (power estimate) and ft_combineplanar cfg.combinemethod='​sum'​ on freq datatype [[http://​mathworld.wolfram.com/​VectorAddition.html|sums]] the vertical and the horizontal components. As the single trial estimates are positive (power estimates), the order of the operation does not influence the output. You can now guess whether the same logic is going to hold for the Event-Related Fields.
  
 ===== Event-Related Fields ===== ===== Event-Related Fields =====